1) Isn't government already earning from AP? So if you want to raise additional 2b by permit.. How? More influx of foreign car into already congested Malaysia or you're merely double counting?
2) what happen between year 1 - 5 while we suffer of lost of income before we can catch up with lelong AP? Can you change this issuance permit before year 2015? I thought this is restricted until 2015.
If you can't change the issuance method until year 2015, then we are playing catch-up, right? So in the mean time we suffer 1.5b loss of income for a couple of years?
Be honest, are we talking Cut backs or other form of taxation?
3) I think that talking about tax but not how it's been reinvested back in the economy is biased.
Same like planning to abolish tax but not explaining cut backs.
Naughty! Naughty!
4) Finally when lelong AP is allowed, why are you confident that the car company wouldn't push down this cost to consumer? Will you be imposing restrictions?
If you're talking about self import what regulations you have in place that 2nd cars imported will be regulated?
Jgn malaysia jadi junk yard for Japanese 5 years old cars pulak...
5) Your stats and ratio is inaccurate.
Please give breakdown of car debts by ranges in car value and income range.
Example, orang kaya who owns 3 luxury cars are diluted in actual aggregated household income. You're not showing the true ratio of car debts to household income.
So is this policy for the convenience of the rich?
Plus for the love of god can we please use stats from year 2011. Why do you keep using year 2009 stats, it's dated.
6) You fail to mention that current AP is for majority holding Bumiputra entrepreneur , "lelong" mean that hak Bumiputra juga mansuh.
Don't get me wrong, I'm pro open competition among Msian but your other Bumi voters have the right to know.You kena citer betul2 baru ada integrity..
Bukan ker you promote towards kerajaan telus, kita kena jujur that this changes the automobile landscape for bumi entrepreneur for ever.
7) So, if incremental revenue would that mean people will be buying more imported cars?
Rafizi, what about encouraging innovation within our country and protecting our industry? What will happen to our graduates in the Vokasional stream? So, again you tak kira the knock on effect on the economy.
8) The new step forward in world economy is to have self sustainable economy within the country rather than imports. Why are we moving backwards? Have you no faith in fellow Malaysian capabilities?
9)Finally, why is pakatan and DAP policy considers no pollution implication and encouraging cars? Mansuh toll, mansuh tax where as in most part of the world we are looking to reduce carbon emission. If only we can price tag the environment!
So, yes cars will be cheaper but you'll feel the pinch nonetheless. Are willing for other cutbacks without actually knowing what will the cutbacks be? At least explain apa cut backs you nak buat.
A more sustainable approach would be aggregating tax by car size, gas emission, numbers of cars etc. tapi tak sebut "mansuh" tak catchy lah kan.... Org tak excited.
Buang masa jerlah you nie... Baik you focus on building reliable and safer public transport.
After all Rafizi, kalau nak seribu daya, tak nak seribu dalih. Jgn mcm DAP pulak asyik berdalih pasal public transport kat Penang tu.
Usaha tangga kejayaan!
~fida.i~
Inga kommentarer:
Skicka en kommentar